Kylian Mbappé

Media name the fee clubs are ready to discuss

Three outlets have published figures for a possible deal. They differ a lot.

A football stadium before a match
Transfer talk continues. Photo: Daniel from Glasgow, United Kingdom / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

None of the clubs has confirmed any figure. We list them only to show how far apart the reports are.

Over the past few days three outlets have each published a number for a possible transfer of Kylian Mbappé. The figures are not close to one another, the sources behind them are unnamed and none of the clubs mentioned has commented. Here is what we know about each report and how much weight it deserves.

Three reports, three different numbers

The first report describes the figure as an opening position that one interested club would be ready to discuss. The second presents a much higher number as the amount the selling club would expect. The third gives a figure between the two and describes it as a total package including add-ons.

ReportWhat the figure refers toSource citedOur reliability rating
First outletPossible opening position of a buying clubUnnamed people close to the talksLow
Second outletExpected price of the selling clubUnnamed club sourcesLow
Third outletTotal package with add-onsIndustry sourcesLow to medium
None of the figures has been confirmed by any club or by the player’s representatives.

The gap between the lowest and the highest figure is large enough to show that at least two of the reports cannot both be accurate. It is also possible that none of them reflects a real conversation between clubs.

Why the figures differ so much

Transfer fees reported before any talks have started are usually built from different starting points. Some outlets estimate what a buyer might offer, others what a seller would accept, and some include bonuses and instalments while others quote only a fixed fee.

  • Fixed fee versus a total including add-ons
  • A buyer’s opening position versus a seller’s asking price
  • Different assumptions about the length of the remaining contract
  • Sources with an interest in pushing the number up or down

Agents and clubs can also use the media to set expectations. A high figure can discourage interest, while a low one can be an attempt to start talks on favourable terms. Readers should keep that in mind with any number published before an official announcement.

What is actually known

The confirmed facts are few. The player is under contract with Real Madrid, the club has not received an official offer as far as is known, and the player’s camp has described the latest reports as speculation. Real Madrid regard the forward as a central part of their team.

On the pitch, nothing suggests the club would want to sell. The forward leads La Liga with 12 goals and two assists after ten rounds, and Real Madrid are top of the table with 25 points.

There is also the question of who would be buying. The reports do not agree on which clubs are interested, and none of the clubs linked with the player has made any public move. Without a named buyer and an official approach, a fee is little more than an estimate of market value.

How a deal of this size would work

If talks ever did start, a fee at the level being discussed would almost certainly be paid in instalments over several years. Add-ons linked to appearances, trophies and team performance are common in deals of this kind and can make up a large part of the total.

Wages would be just as important as the fee. A player at this level earns a salary that only a few clubs can afford, and any buyer would have to fit it inside its budget and within the financial rules that apply to its league and to UEFA competitions.

The timing is the other obstacle. Big transfers in January are rare because clubs are reluctant to lose key players halfway through the season, and buying clubs often prefer to wait for the summer when more options are available.

  • Fee likely split into instalments
  • Add-ons could be a large share of any total
  • Salary is a second major hurdle
  • January deals of this size are rare

Our approach to transfer figures

We publish reported fees only when several outlets are discussing them and when it helps readers understand the story. We do not treat any number as fact until a club confirms it, and we label each figure with the type of source it comes from.

In this case the most useful conclusion is not any single number but the gap between them. When three reports differ this much, it usually means that no serious negotiation has begun. We will update this article if any club or the player’s representatives give an official figure, and all related stories are collected on our Mbappé transfer page.

Read also

Related pages